https://rumble.com/v13v4sv-2000-mules.html
This is now available!
Folks,
I've switched to Substack https://cryptocrow.substack.com/ for future postings and I've pulled you all in. If you were here on an annual membership, you're now on a 1 year trial on Substack. If you are here as a monthly member, you're now on a 1 month trial on Substack, Free members are signed up as free on Substack. So, you should all have emails letting you know, just follow up on those. If you have any questions, just email me at [email protected]
I've essentially merged my Locals and other platforms into Substack where I'll be putting my focus from now on. It's just a much smoother platform built to aid in growth.
Hey everyone!
I've been looking at different platforms to maintain a regular newsletter type system with a community builder and other tools and I'm really leaning towards Substack. What do you guys think? If I migrate over, all paid subscribers will be migrated over with the term of your subscription starting fresh there so if you're annual, your annual account will start over, monthly, etc. All free subscribers will just be added to the free tier on Substack.
I'm just not liking this system here much and it all just isn't very inviting if I'm honest. Let me know what you guys think?
I just recorded a video for tomorrow at 1pm EST about the Conservative's plans to regulate crypto, the SEC, CFTC etc and its interesting how even the Right's efforts appear to support elements of what the Left plans to do as it relates to crypto. What I haven't yet figured out is why the Left has been thwarting crypto efforts directly for years now if its in line with what they are trying to accomplish overall.
We know Larry Fink of Blackrock has discussed the tokenization of real world assets many times, from real estate to the stock market. They are funding a new Exchange in Texas. We also know they are 24 trading traditional stocks and its growing to the fear of Wall Street.
Between all of that and the obvious global push for CBDC's and more, the narrative is forming around digital assets. In my video I discuss this book which is over 900 pages and is a breakdown of all proposed changes to all US policies for the next conservative adminstration. They are ultimately looking to consolidate a lot of Regulatory arms into the SEC while saying that only particular cryptos that provide certain interests should be viewed as securities and the rest are commodities. Some of it discusses limiting the power the Chairman has while empowering others within the SEC to act without the Chairman. No actions based on any ESG standards for race, etc as well as getting rid of the Accredidated Investor status entirely if not make it much easier to obtain the status. Many other notes in the video but ultimately both sides are working towards embracing blockchain in different ways, though I haven't yet figured out why the SEC has been working so hard to date making it seemingly difficult for many legit blockchain companies.
One individual recently sent me a long Twitter DM proposing the idea that Gensler isn't anti crypto at all and rather working to bring action and attention to key blockchain efforts knowing his efforts will fail while still appeasing the administration that appointed him. Ultimately shedding light on key assets and platforms so that they are able to set the standard for all other crypto and platforms moving forward. It's something I've pondered myself for years now. Why would a blockchain bull get appointed to the SEC Chair just to dunk on the crypto market? Are his efforts in line with what I mentioned above or are they intentionally trying to supress the blockchain market in the US because the overall efforts are to bring the US economically in line and on similar levels as others countries to establish a single currency for all of them? Anyone remember the talk of the Amero?
There is a lot I'm still trying to make sense of and put together.
